nothing can be done to fix what happened only fix the issue moving forward.

He needed life imprisoned

@@naznauth3351 why? do you think his sentence would prevent anyone from getting into a vehicle while high? People still get DUIs all the time. The person has behavior issues. There is no evidence presented that he is not able to be rehabilitated to correct his irresponsible behavior.

@@WilliamAshleyOnline It can't fix the past but it can give justice to this family.

If this is in Florida, this kid will be in jail in Florida State Prison for all his natural life

Really?

@@JasonPatrick-tj4xj This is obviously a bad faith representation of the decision... 🙄

The misrepresentation of marijuana labels is interesting . It's been reported in mainstream media several times since legalization that legal marijuana products in Canada have been repeatedly sold with inaccurate labels. One news article I read highlighting the fact that one product contained five times the THC content compared to the label. Clearly a case where accountability for potential crimes as a result of legal use shouldn't necessarily be held by a voluntary drug user! Five times as potent as the label ? Wow. And how insane is it that this happened and is continuing to happen resulting in no criminal investigation/charges ? Even though the product in question undoubtedly exceeded the 30% THC legal limit. For that product to still be within legal limits it would have had to been labelled with 6% THC content or less . ..indicating the purchase was in fact made for medicinal and not recreational use ..lol. If you're buying legally sold labelled 6% THC products and are given something that has 5times the labelled THC amount ???....This is both voluntary and involuntary . ...and it's far more likely the product exceeded the legal limit of THC content . If true could result in unwanted and dangerous hallucinations . I stopped buying legal Canadian marijuana products specifically for this reason as i prefer a milder effect. I have smoked legal products labelled 10% THC that were clearly more potent than other products labelled at higher THC content . The fact that this is continuing to happen is absolutely disgusting !

We live in a pathetic country and it gets more and more pathetic every year

it was extreme intoxication like not being capable of thinking if I recall correctly. Again people like you want to punish the person not the state of mind. People are put on trial for their state of mind at the time of an offence.. defences arise with what caused the person to do what they did and judge those reactions. Only absolute liabilities ignore the mind or defences. Again you dont seem to understand the legal system and how it judges people or puts sentence on them or the reasons. Someone who is plastered is not making decisions of their normal process and is under the influence of something altering their normal state of mind. the conditions that led them to become drunk should be considered but their actions while drunk should not weigh on mens rea unless they undertook to drunk such that they could do that act thus the intention was formed before loss of faculty.. this is no different than a temporary insanity defence and diverion.. and its also important to understand addictions are seen as mental health problems not decisions thus it plays into defence of the mind because the person is under the influence of something leading them to take a course of action they would not do if not suffering from that medical problem. The issue is that to punish additions doesnt treat addictions properly the premis is addiction are not a choice they are a medical disability. They are things people need treatment for not punishment for. Its important to understand this was for extreme intoxication if I recall correctly not simply having a few drinks. I would think these types of altered mind defences may give rice to other not criminally responsible setences as a division in treatment or medical sentencing to address the cause of the victimization.. recognizing the source of the creation of a victim was done through drugs and alchohol use not through the decisions of the person to victimize another. Liability and guilt is important in the cause of action not simply the result of action. Punishing events is not justice it is simply appeasing a dark and evil part of the human mind. Restorative justice, provides for the event to be comensated for and for people to be fixed to make society function again. Simply throwing someone in a room for an extended period of time is donjon justice and does nothing to address the social issues. The time in jail should reflect time to correct the behavior or psychosocial issues that made the person into someone that was a trigger for an event of victimization. When actual change has occured that person can then be paroled, the timelines are frankly arbitrary.

life isnt 25 years in canada.

it doesnt. this is why we need to bring back public hangings

4.3 years for murder ! A guy in Burnaby bc got just that for murdering another man with a knife and his accomplice walked away with probation. He also assaulted a woman punched her in the face repeatedly. He got 4.5 years … He’s already out on our streets again still younganddumb! No justice in Canada 😞

@@gregoryvincent2735 On the bright side, time does not scale linearly in human experience.

Agreed - it blows my mind to this day, that the sentence is so minimalist. He's 21 - he'll be out of prison by the age of 35 (for time already served). He can then go off, get an education, have a family and go on vacations whenever he pleases. That makes no sense whatsoever. Laws should be based around fairness - that sentence is not remotely fair to the deceased, nor to the surviving husband/grandparents etc. How the kid somehow was driving a vehicle with 15 driving infractions - is just ridiculous. He clearly didn't care at all - nor did his caregivers care, or were unable to control his access to car keys?

he basically got life with time served.. life is 20 years in canada and he had pretrial detention for a few years.

@@Bobofet241 yes this was my mistake I initially confused it with someone who ran into two kids and it stated that it was 3 years ago or something that is an error on my part. Thankyou didnt realize that was still in there. In that case it was a teen who did it. I attempted to remove that part as these case facts bring up another case when they are searched online. None the less if it happened last year I assume he had a 1 year pretrial detention unless he was given bail I would think the same facts as brought up during sentencing may have prevented bail being provided also as he is more or less deemed a reckless danger to society.

That social worker was gaslighting you smh

Melanistic.......you can tell that the judge is a liberalist lift wing thinker..........who sentence this kid, so what's that you? They are for the criminals and not the victims of crime.

My friend got 20 years for beating a man to death then burning his body in a dumpster.

What about mothers aborting multiple babies?

Probably 17 years. This is precident setting

Out on parole in four maybe five years.

People forget.

thats canada for ya marco muzzo is already walking as a free man

Grief ...... how much suffer I can't even imagine . God bless you .stay strong .

@@hopehope7503 Thank you ❤

thats why legal system is not working and criminals just commit murders, theft when their life is already low enough. Way too protect towards criminals. law is supposed to protect normal people, not criminals. DUI should be straight murder with intent

Now that's the truth, that boy would be turned out quick and working a pole

He was going twice the speed limit.

4 ounces

I am very sorry to hear that. Is there any possibility of a re trial of the witness. Could sue the witness, the police would have the witness information and statement on file. Any relation between the witness and the driver. What angel was the witness on can they remember their original statement. What proof do they have as a witness. Do they have 202/20 eye site. Any possible medical condition that could cloud judgement.

@@bubbles3161 the police officer who did the report died. A witness who came forward to me and I encouraged her to go to the police they blew her off. The insurance got their hooks onto the witness who told me the driver was at fault and what happened. In her statement to them she changed her story. I am glad I kept her contact with me that was done over fb messenger. The police had their mind made up it was my fault from the start. Someone I know found out the driver was related to the cop who did the report. My neighbour was a cop and his comment about the report was it was a “lovely work of fiction”. There wasn’t even a report from the cop who spoke to me while I was lying on the road.

@@laurabailey1054. I read your comment earlier and I'm sorry to hear what happened. My comment was related to the driver who struck and killed a woman and her three young daughters. Sorry for any confusion. I read you're new comment and was glad to hear your friends helped figure out what really happened. Local police departments have started to recruit officer from outside the local area and they are moved as they decide where their skill set would be best suited. This change in policing was introduced for this very reason. Local police taking sides because they know the father of the son who was charged for example.